Z3MCoupe.com Forums

Go Back   Z3MCoupe.com Forums > Z3MCoupé.com Forums > General Discussion
HOME Gallery Register Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-05-2006, 05:27 PM
BEN's Avatar
BEN BEN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,431
Default

good call!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-05-2006, 06:44 PM
fastdrive fastdrive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 919
Send a message via MSN to fastdrive
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c_w
Nor be best suited to track IMO, with a lot less chassis stiffness etc, unless you had a roll cage that braced the whole car.

If I was to do an engine change on that 2.8 Coupe I'd fit the 3.0 or possibly leave the 2.8 in. The 2.8 engine is lighter than the M Coupe engine, the car is 100kg lighter which helps for trackdays.

The other thing is that the 2.8 engine is restricted from the factory to 193bhp and it seems quite easy to get low 200s bhp, some people have got 250bhp out of it which if you look at the lighter weight and probability of a 3.2 M engine making around 300bhp instead of 321bhp then there might not be much difference in straight line performance.
Sincereley i drive one time the 2.8 and never tell to compared to mine M version!
It goes same a clio rs,also i think the clio goes fastes! :)
__________________
www.fastdrive.org
S50 black/black-red In Rome
Front BBK Stoptech Red+Eibach Sway Bars+Kw Clubsport Whit Camber plates+Weichers Strutbar+Agk Urethane front Silent Block & differential Bushing+Tuner Motorposrt Alluminium Rear Mount+Hamann Exaust
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-05-2006, 07:41 PM
Greenbat's Avatar
Greenbat Greenbat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,008
Default

Test drove the car today. It happened to be the same car that I have seen around a few times. And even to me I could not tell the difference from afar.

Anyway the car was (he thinks) bought by a British soldier based in Germany hence the import but RHD.

Exhaust note suprisingly very close to that off an MC, but not as responsive or quick as an MC. I think from 3rd gear onwards it will be see ya!

Greenbat

Kiddle you have a PM
__________________

Ex MC Owner
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 13-05-2006, 07:51 PM
Not a Diesel!!! Not a Diesel!!! is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny Sussex
Posts: 76
Default

Always wondered why BMW did not make this car in RHD.

I love M Coupe but cannot bring myself to swallow expense for performace I would use so rarely.

As the owner of a (tweaked) 328 Sport Coupe this would be ideal move. This engine realy does rev once the restrictions are lifted.

Any thoughts on how you would insure it? Would it default to M Coupe insurance as it is the dead spit?

I remember when I owned a LHD E30 M3 I dreaded the question.... Is the car std UK Spec RHD?
__________________
After 14 years of dreaming M Coupe bought 23/8/12.. then sold it 13 months later. Boo. Now replaced with 2005 Sti.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 16-05-2006, 07:48 PM
harry_wy harry_wy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: West yorkshire
Posts: 13
Send a message via MSN to harry_wy
Default

Ive got a 328 coupe too, thinkin of de restrictin it. Any idea's????
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 16-05-2006, 08:23 PM
BEN's Avatar
BEN BEN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,431
Default

yeah
e36coupe.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
lhd, z3 coupe

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.